State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rogers

812 P.2d 14, 107 Or. App. 370, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 804
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 22, 1991·No. 79,651-A; CA A64589·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant is a juvenile who had been placed on probation by the juvenile court for offenses that would have been crimes if committed by an adult. Two probation violation petitions were filed, alleging that he had unlawfully possessed a pistol and had violated curfew ordinances. He moved to suppress the pistol on the ground that it had been unlawfully seized. The court denied the motion on the basis that, even if it had been unlawfully seized, it would still be admissible in a probation violation hearing under State v. Kissell, 83 Or App 630, 732 P2d 940, rev dismissed 303 Or 369, 736 P2d 564 (1987). The court admitted the evidence and revoked the child’s probation.

Appellant concedes that the evidence is admissible under Kissell but asks that we overrule that case. We decline.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rogers, 812 P.2d 14, 107 Or. App. 370, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

812 P.2d 14 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Rogers
836 P.2d 127 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)