State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rodriguez

648 P.2d 1360, 58 Or. App. 531
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 11, 1982·No. No. 1232 & 1238 CA A21863·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming the termination of his parental rights. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Rodriguez, 56 Or App 592, 643 P2d 424 (1982). He contends the state did not prove the allegations by clear and convincing evidence as required by Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599 (1982). The petition for reconsideration is granted. We have reexamined the record in light of State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 55 Or App 897, 640 P2d 652, rem’d 292 Or 822, modified 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401 (1982), and adhere to our prior decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rodriguez, 648 P.2d 1360, 58 Or. App. 531 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

648 P.2d 1360 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santosky v. Kramer
455 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell
648 P.2d 401 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell
640 P.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell
642 P.2d 1167 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1982)