State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Nordstrom

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Nordstrom

608 P.2d 178, 45 Or. App. 191, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2304

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 17, 1980·No. No. 55,982, CA 15006·Published

Opinion

THORNTON, J.

The mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights, assigning as error the ultimate conclusion and, in particular, the admission of certain hospital records concerning her participation in both state and federal drug abuse programs. We have reviewed the record de novo and, ignoring the challenged records, find the evidence overwhelming that this mother is presently unfit to raise the child and will likely be unable to do so in the foreseeable future. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Hayworth, 35 Or App 161, 165, 581 P2d 100, rev den 284 Or 235 (1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THORNTON, J.

The mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights, assigning as error the ultimate conclusion and, in particular, the admission of certain hospital records concerning her participation in both state and federal drug abuse programs. We have reviewed the record de novo and, ignoring the challenged records, find the evidence overwhelming that this mother is presently unfit to raise the child and will likely be unable to do so in the foreseeable future. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Hayworth, 35 Or App 161, 165, 581 P2d 100, rev den 284 Or 235 (1978).

Affirmed.

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Nordstrom, 608 P.2d 178, 45 Or. App. 191, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2304 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

608 P.2d 178 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Nordstrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related