State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. McLeod

655 P.2d 1101, 61 Or. App. 223, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4417
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 29, 1982
DocketNo. 78-374, CA A23490
StatusPublished

This text of 655 P.2d 1101 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. McLeod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. McLeod, 655 P.2d 1101, 61 Or. App. 223, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4417 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a trial court order dismissing its petition to terminate putative father’s parental rights in the child. On de novo review, and applying the constitutionally required “clear and convincing standard of proof,” Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, 102 S Ct 1388, 71 L Ed 2d 599 (1982); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401, rev den 293 Or 521 (1982), we find that the state established the allegation that the putative father is unfit as a parent under ORS 419.523(2). The trial court should have ordered termination.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santosky v. Kramer
455 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell
648 P.2d 401 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 P.2d 1101, 61 Or. App. 223, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-juvenile-department-v-mcleod-orctapp-1982.