State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L.
555 P.2d 805, 27 Or. App. 177, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1381
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L.. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Or. App. 257 →
Opinion
Upon review of the record, we agree with the finding of the trial court. Use of recently stolen property, together with a noncredible explanation as to the manner in which it came into possession, is sufficient proof of knowing use of stolen property. State v. Murphy, 253 Or 444, 446, 455 P2d 178 (1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L., 555 P.2d 805, 27 Or. App. 177, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1381 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
555 P.2d 805 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Murphy
455 P.2d 178 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)