State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Kelley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Kelley

805 P.2d 163, 106 Or. App. 91, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 307

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 20, 1991

Docket8810-82881; CA A61921

StatusPublished

This text of 805 P.2d 163 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Kelley, 805 P.2d 163, 106 Or. App. 91, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 307 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Father has petitioned for review of our decision affirming the trial court without opinion. 104 Or App 446, 800 P2d 1094 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), allow it and affirm.

Father assigns as error the introduction of hearsay statements, under OEC 803(4), through testimony by a student intern training for a master’s degree in social work. On de novo review, ORS 419.561(4), we reach the same conclusion, even without that testimony, as did the trial court.

Father’s remaining assignments of error have no merit.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI