State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Henry

717 P.2d 253, 78 Or. App. 658, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2657

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 16, 1986

DocketJUV 24,556; CA A37629

StatusPublished

This text of 717 P.2d 253 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Henry, 717 P.2d 253, 78 Or. App. 658, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2657 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The mother of Teresa Olson appeals a decree of emancipation issued pursuant to ORS 109.565. She contends that the court did not hold a second hearing as required by ORS 109.560. Respondent concedes that the court erred. When a petition for emancipation is filed under ORS 109.555, the court is required to hold a preliminary hearing within 10 days of the date of the petition. ORS 109.560(1). A second and final hearing must be held no later than 60 days after the petition is filed. ORS 109.560(2). The court essentially consolidated the two hearings over the objections of the mother. We agree that the court erred.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The mother of Teresa Olson appeals a decree of emancipation issued pursuant to ORS 109.565. She contends that the court did not hold a second hearing as required by ORS 109.560. Respondent concedes that the court erred. When a petition for emancipation is filed under ORS 109.555, the court is required to hold a preliminary hearing within 10 days of the date of the petition. ORS 109.560(1). A second and final hearing must be held no later than 60 days after the petition is filed. ORS 109.560(2). The court essentially consolidated the two hearings over the objections of the mother. We agree that the court erred.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 P.2d 253, 78 Or. App. 658, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-juvenile-department-v-henry-orctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack