State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett

865 P.2d 1295, 318 Or. 323, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 6
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 1994·No. CC 86110; CA A70521 (Control); SC S40547; D8308-66069; CA A70580; SC S40548·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

review dismissed as improvidently allowed January 27, 1994

In the Matter of C. and K., Children. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. James CORNETT and Shannon Huskey, Petitioners on Review, and Karin CORNETT, fka Karin Huskey, Respondent on Review. In the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon HUSKEY, Petitioner on Review, and Karin HUSKEY, nka Karin Cornett, Respondent on Review.

Michael A. Greenlick, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Cornett.

Peter Miller, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review Shannon Huskey.

[324]*324Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County. With her on the response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

No appearance contra for respondent on review Karin Cornett, fka Karin Huskey.

No appearance contra for the children.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett, 865 P.2d 1295, 318 Or. 323, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 6 (Or. 1994).

865 P.2d 1295 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gonzales
423 P.3d 149 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2018)
Department of Human Services v. J. G.
308 P.3d 296 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Pfaff
994 P.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)
State v. Arnold
893 P.2d 1050 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)