State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Bottoms

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Bottoms

585 P.2d 47, 36 Or. App. 623, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 1973

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 16, 1978

DocketNo. 43,646-A, CA 10227

StatusPublished

This text of 585 P.2d 47 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Bottoms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Bottoms, 585 P.2d 47, 36 Or. App. 623, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 1973 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBERTS, J.

This is an appeal from an order revoking a juvenile’s probation and committing him to the MacLaren School for Boys.

The issue is whether a juvenile’s probation may be revoked, thereby committing him to an institution, where the juvenile received no written notice that the probation review hearing would be on the question of probation revocation.

On July 22, 1977, the juvenile admitted to a charge of assault in the third degree and was made a ward of the court. He was placed on probation for one year and was also required to make restitution of $22.50 within 60 days and to perform 50 hours of community service work within 180 days, in addition to the "usual conditions of formal probation.” The probation was set for review on January 11, 1978.

In December, 1977, the juvenile was again before the court and admitted committing criminal mischief in the third degree. At the scheduled January probation review, the court determined that the conditions of probation had not been complied with and consequently revoked the juvenile’s probation and committed him to the MacLaren School for Boys.

The juvenile claims that it is improper to revoke his probation in a review hearing when the juvenile had not received notice that his liberty was in jeopardy. ORS 419.529(2) provides:

"(2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, notice and a hearingas, provided in ORS 419.486 to 419.505 shall be granted in any case where the effect of modifying or setting aside the order will or may be to deprive a parent of the legal custody of the child, to place the child in an institution or agency or to transfer the child from one institution or agency to another. * * *” (Emphasis supplied.)

[626]*626In view of this statute, it was error not to give the required notice; however, the child claims no prejudice and we find none.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI