State ex rel. Judah v. Lemonds
This text of 29 Ind. 437 (State ex rel. Judah v. Lemonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit on relation of a creditor of an estate against the administrator thereof and his sureties, upon his official bond. The breaches assigned are, a failure to pay money [438]*438into court, and that the administrator converted the money to his own use. The proof on the trial showed that if the administrator violated any condition of his bond, it was by paying in full certain claims against the estate, when the assets were insufficient to pay in full all demands, and by paying too much money to the widow of the decedent. Neither of these acts, however, amounted to converting the money of the estate to his own use. Nor can the creditor complain that the administrator does not pay money into court. It is the duty of that officer to pay debts, and so long as any indebtedness exists, the creditor cannot complain that he does not pay the funds of the estate into court. We think the court below did not commit error in finding for the defendant under the breaches assigned.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Ind. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-judah-v-lemonds-ind-1868.