State ex rel. Joyner v. State

896 So. 2d 45, 2005 La. LEXIS 347, 2005 WL 758272
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 18, 2005·No. No. 2004-KP-2575·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 309-75; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 KW 1870.

Writ granted; conviction and sentence reinstated. Because Campbell v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 392, 118 S.Ct. 1419, 140 L.Ed.2d 551 (1998), does not apply retroactively, see Coe v. Bell, 161 F.3d 320, 353, 355 (6th Cir.1998), relator has not shown that his claim is based on a new rule of constitutional criminal procedure “retroactively applicable to his case.” La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) (2). Accordingly, he filed below untimely. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. See also State v. Simmons, 00-3017 (La.5/4/01), 791 So.2d 644.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Joyner v. State, 896 So. 2d 45, 2005 La. LEXIS 347, 2005 WL 758272 (La. 2005).

896 So. 2d 45 (State ex rel. Joyner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Louisiana
523 U.S. 392 (Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Simmons
791 So. 2d 644 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2001)