State Ex Rel. Joseph v. State
This text of 482 So. 2d 680 (State Ex Rel. Joseph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Ensley JOSEPH, III
v.
STATE of Louisiana.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
*681 Ensley Joseph, III in pro. per.
Douglas Greenburg, Dist. Atty., Houma, for State respondent.
WRIT DENIED: Relator complains that his requests for free trial and sentencing transcripts have been denied by district court, the district court clerk of court, and the indigent defender's office. The only denial properly presented for our review is that by the district court. Relator's motion requesting the transcripts from district court was properly denied because it failed to show a particularized need for the transcripts. See Route v. Blackburn, 498 F.Supp. 875 (W.D.La.1980). See also United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
482 So. 2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-joseph-v-state-lactapp-1985.