State ex rel. Jordan v. Rolsen

75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 30, 1906
DocketNo. 10382
StatusPublished

This text of 75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587 (State ex rel. Jordan v. Rolsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Jordan v. Rolsen, 75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587 (Ohio 1906).

Opinion

Petition dismissed. State, ex rel. Springer, v. Hadley et al., 50 Ohio St., 167, and State, ex rel. Attorney-General, v. Spiedel, 62 Ohio St., 156, are authority for the conclusion that there is no vacancy in the office of the prosecuting attorney of Plamilton county. Other questions not considered.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jordan-v-rolsen-ohio-1906.