State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pool

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pool

28 N.C. 288

DecidedJune 5, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.C. 288 (State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Jordan v. Pool, 28 N.C. 288 (N.C. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Nash, J.

In the opinion of his Honor, we concur. The only question sent here is as to the validity of a sale, made under such circumstances. The land was sold under ft. fas. which bore teste after the death of Josiali Jordan, without any sci. fa. against the heirs. The effect of a sale so made, has already been declared by this Court in the case of Wood v. Harrison, 1 Dev. & Bat. 356. The action was to recover the land sold, and the Court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict, because it was sold by the Sheriff under a ft. fa. which was tested after the death of the defendant in the execution, without having previously brought in the heirs.- The same principle was decided in the prior case of Bowen against McCullough, N. C. T. Rep. 261. In this case^ the sale was made under like circumstances : it is therefore void. The title to the land is unchanged — it is still in the heirs of Josiah Jordan. They have suffered no wrong or injury. As the land is yet theirs, they have no right to the money produced by the sale. The retention of it by Pool is no breach of his official bond. The plaintiff cannot sustain the action.

PeR Curtam. Judgment affirmed»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nash, J.

In the opinion of his Honor, we concur. The only question sent here is as to the validity of a sale, made under such circumstances. The land was sold under ft. fas. which bore teste after the death of Josiali Jordan, without any sci. fa. against the heirs. The effect of a sale so made, has already been declared by this Court in the case of Wood v. Harrison, 1 Dev. & Bat. 356. The action was to recover the land sold, and the Court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict, because it was sold by the Sheriff under a ft. fa. which was tested after the death of the defendant in the execution, without having previously brought in the heirs.- The same principle was decided in the prior case of Bowen against McCullough, N. C. T. Rep. 261. In this case^ the sale was made under like circumstances : it is therefore void. The title to the land is unchanged — it is still in the heirs of Josiah Jordan. They have suffered no wrong or injury. As the land is yet theirs, they have no right to the money produced by the sale. The retention of it by Pool is no breach of his official bond. The plaintiff cannot sustain the action.

PeR Curtam. Judgment affirmed»

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.C. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jordan-v-pool-nc-1846.