State, ex rel. Jones v. Ward

Ohio Court of Appeals

State, ex rel. Jones v. Ward

29 Ohio Law Rep. 36

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 2, 1964

Docket38675

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio Law Rep. 36 (State, ex rel. Jones v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, ex rel. Jones v. Ward, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 36 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Gibson, Judge.

One who has been illegally deprived of civil-service rights does not waive such rights by accepting inconsistent employment during the pendency of litigation respecting those rights. Such a person is entitled to seek, and indeed has a duty to seek, employment to mitigate the loss of income pending a determination of such rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias and Griffith, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents. O’Neill, J., not participating.

MERIT DOCKET

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Gibson, Judge.

One who has been illegally deprived of civil-service rights does not waive such rights by accepting inconsistent employment during the pendency of litigation respecting those rights. Such a person is entitled to seek, and indeed has a duty to seek, employment to mitigate the loss of income pending a determination of such rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias and Griffith, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents. O’Neill, J., not participating.

MERIT DOCKET

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ohio Law Rep. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jones-v-ward-ohioctapp-1964.