State Ex Rel. Jones v. Stewart, Judge

53 N.E.2d 346, 222 Ind. 353, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 133
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1944·No. No. 27,934.·Published

Opinion

*354 Per Curiam.

This action is denominated a petition for a “Writ of Mandate and Prohibition.” It recites certain actions of the respondent which are alleged to be erroneous. It does not question the court’s jurisdiction. It does not allege that the court refused to act. It alleges that the court acted contrary to the relator’s conception of what should have been done. It therefore does not state a cause of action.

The petition is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 53 N. E. (2d) 346.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Jones v. Stewart, Judge, 53 N.E.2d 346, 222 Ind. 353, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 133 (Ind. 1944).

53 N.E.2d 346 (State Ex Rel. Jones v. Stewart, Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.