State ex rel. Jones v. Russo

2024 Ohio 2915
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 30, 2024
Docket114088
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 Ohio 2915 (State ex rel. Jones v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Jones v. Russo, 2024 Ohio 2915 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Jones v. Russo, 2024-Ohio-2915.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : THOMAS JONES, : Relator, : No. 114088 v. : JUDGE NANCY M. RUSSO,

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED DATED: July 30, 2024

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 576101 Order No. 576338

Appearances:

Thomas Jones, pro se.

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J.:

Thomas Jones, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of

mandamus. Jones seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Nancy M.

Russo, the respondent, to serve him with a copy of a judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B), that denied his petition for postconviction relief on May 23, 2024. Judge

Russo has filed a motion for summary judgment that is granted.

Attached to Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of

a judgment entry, journalized July 9, 2024, that provides:

Defendant’s motion for verified request for the court to direct clerk to serve appellant pursuant to Civil Rule 58(B) filed on June 11, 2024, is granted in part and denied in part.

This entry and the court’s journal entry issued on May 23, 2024, denying defendant’s petition for postconviction [relief] will be served in compliance with Civil R. 58(B).

Defendant’s remaining claims in his motion for verified request for the court to direct clerk to serve appellant pursuant to Civil Rule 58(B) filed on June 11, 2024, are denied.

Pursuant to Civil R. 58(B), the clerk of courts is hereby ordered to send a copy of this entry and the attached journal entry issued on May 23, 2024, to the following parties and its date of entry upon the journal; ....

Jones’s complaint for mandamus is moot because Judge Russo has

fulfilled her duty, under Civ.R. 58(B), and ordered the clerk to serve notice of the

May 23, 2024 judgment entry upon all parties in CV-94-316693. An action for a writ

of mandamus becomes moot when the requested relief is attained. State ex rel.

Jerninghan v. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278 (1996).

Accordingly, we grant Judge Russo’s motion to dismiss. Costs

waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this

judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). Writ denied.

_______________________ ________ KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., and FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Court of Common Pleas
658 N.E.2d 723 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ohio 2915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jones-v-russo-ohioctapp-2024.