State ex rel. Jones v. Russo
This text of 2024 Ohio 2915 (State ex rel. Jones v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Jones v. Russo, 2024-Ohio-2915.]
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. : THOMAS JONES, : Relator, : No. 114088 v. : JUDGE NANCY M. RUSSO,
Respondent. :
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED DATED: July 30, 2024
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 576101 Order No. 576338
Appearances:
Thomas Jones, pro se.
Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J.:
Thomas Jones, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of
mandamus. Jones seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Nancy M.
Russo, the respondent, to serve him with a copy of a judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B), that denied his petition for postconviction relief on May 23, 2024. Judge
Russo has filed a motion for summary judgment that is granted.
Attached to Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of
a judgment entry, journalized July 9, 2024, that provides:
Defendant’s motion for verified request for the court to direct clerk to serve appellant pursuant to Civil Rule 58(B) filed on June 11, 2024, is granted in part and denied in part.
This entry and the court’s journal entry issued on May 23, 2024, denying defendant’s petition for postconviction [relief] will be served in compliance with Civil R. 58(B).
Defendant’s remaining claims in his motion for verified request for the court to direct clerk to serve appellant pursuant to Civil Rule 58(B) filed on June 11, 2024, are denied.
Pursuant to Civil R. 58(B), the clerk of courts is hereby ordered to send a copy of this entry and the attached journal entry issued on May 23, 2024, to the following parties and its date of entry upon the journal; ....
Jones’s complaint for mandamus is moot because Judge Russo has
fulfilled her duty, under Civ.R. 58(B), and ordered the clerk to serve notice of the
May 23, 2024 judgment entry upon all parties in CV-94-316693. An action for a writ
of mandamus becomes moot when the requested relief is attained. State ex rel.
Jerninghan v. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278 (1996).
Accordingly, we grant Judge Russo’s motion to dismiss. Costs
waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this
judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). Writ denied.
_______________________ ________ KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., and FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 Ohio 2915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jones-v-russo-ohioctapp-2024.