State ex rel. Jones v. Manning

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Jones v. Manning

874 S.W.2d 413, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 253

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1994·No. No. WD 47435·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a paternity action. The putative father asserts error in: (1) the admission of his blood test on the grounds the Uniform Parentage Act (U.P.A.) should not have applied; and, (2) the admission of evidence of the child’s birth date, which differed from that stated in the pleadings, on the grounds it did not give him an adequate opportunity to prepare his defense. The judgement establishing paternity is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a paternity action. The putative father asserts error in: (1) the admission of his blood test on the grounds the Uniform Parentage Act (U.P.A.) should not have applied; and, (2) the admission of evidence of the child’s birth date, which differed from that stated in the pleadings, on the grounds it did not give him an adequate opportunity to prepare his defense. The judgement establishing paternity is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

State ex rel. Jones v. Manning, 874 S.W.2d 413, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 253 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

874 S.W.2d 413 (State ex rel. Jones v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.