State ex rel. Jones v. Galloway

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Jones v. Galloway

164 S.W. 581, 255 Mo. 637, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 46

DecidedMarch 3, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.W. 581 (State ex rel. Jones v. Galloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Jones v. Galloway, 164 S.W. 581, 255 Mo. 637, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 46 (Mo. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODSON, P. J.

The facts of this case are the same as those in the case of State ex rel. v. Young, ante, page 627, this day decided, differing only in the names and persons of defendants, the description and quantity of land affected, the amount of benefits [638]*638assessed against the same, and the credits allowed thereon, on acount of the work done and materials furnished for the old levee mentioned in the evidence, which was appropriated and used by the commissioners in the construction of the new levee.

The law governing the facts of this case is the same as that announced in that, consequently the ruling there is controlling here.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODSON, P. J.

The facts of this case are the same as those in the case of State ex rel. v. Young, ante, page 627, this day decided, differing only in the names and persons of defendants, the description and quantity of land affected, the amount of benefits [638]*638assessed against the same, and the credits allowed thereon, on acount of the work done and materials furnished for the old levee mentioned in the evidence, which was appropriated and used by the commissioners in the construction of the new levee.

The law governing the facts of this case is the same as that announced in that, consequently the ruling there is controlling here.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.W. 581, 255 Mo. 637, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jones-v-galloway-mo-1914.