State ex rel. Johnson v. Whitley

646 So. 2d 366, 1994 La. LEXIS 2765, 1994 WL 658866
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 18, 1994·No. No. 93-KH-0865·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Johnson, Percy; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 248-206.

Writ granted. Relator moved the district court under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 882 to correct an illegally lenient sentence and the district court denied the motion as untimely pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A). However, the timeliness provisions of LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 930.8(A) apply to applications for post-conviction relief made under LSA-C.Cr.P. arts. 924-930.8, and do not apply to motions to correct illegal sentences made under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 882, which states that illegal sentences “may be corrected at any time.” State ex rel. Johnson v. Day, 637 So.2d 1062 (La.1994); cf. State v. Johnson, 220 La. 64, 55 So.2d 782 (1951). The district court is therefore ordered to address the merits of relator’s claims.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Johnson v. Whitley, 646 So. 2d 366, 1994 La. LEXIS 2765, 1994 WL 658866 (La. 1994).

646 So. 2d 366 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cormier
702 So. 2d 929 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State ex rel. Johnson v. Whitley
688 So. 2d 532 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)