State ex rel. Johnson v. State

614 So. 2d 71, 1993 La. LEXIS 1136, 1993 WL 78092
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 19, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-0529·Published

Opinion

In re Johnson, Harold; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92KW-2743; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 256-382.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Relator also represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production for the transcript of a hearing conducted on July 17, 1992, which he filed on or about November 22, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Johnson v. State, 614 So. 2d 71, 1993 La. LEXIS 1136, 1993 WL 78092 (La. 1993).

614 So. 2d 71 (State ex rel. Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.