State ex rel. Johnson v. Cornwell

12 Neb. 470
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lake, Oh. J.

It appears that the relator paid his money into the city treasury, in good faith, for the purpose of procuring a license to sell spirituous liquors. A formal license was issued to him which, for the reason that certain requirements of the recently enacted general license law had not. been compliedwith by the corporate authorities, was absolutely void. Those requirements have since been observed by the authorities, so that licenses may now be issued and the question presented is, whether the relator is entitled to receive one for the unexpired term for which he: paid, on the credit of his former payment, so far as it will go, the money not having been returned to him. We, think that he is; and a writ of mandamus is therefore awarded, as prayed, requiring one to be issued accordingly.

Writ Awarded..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Johnson v. Cornwell, 12 Neb. 470 (Neb. 1882).

12 Neb. 470 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Cornwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bart v. Pierce County
111 P. 582 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Allsman v. Oklahoma City
1908 OK 79 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Wood v. School District
115 N.W. 308 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1908)
City of Auburn v. Mayer
78 N.W. 462 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Pearson v. City of Seattle
44 P. 884 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)
Guthrie v. State ex rel. School District No. 7
66 N.W. 853 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Chamberlain v. City of Tecumseh
61 N.W. 632 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Lydick v. Korner
15 Neb. 500 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1884)