State ex rel. Johnson v. Brunner

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Johnson v. Brunner

925 N.E.2d 140, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1549

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 2010

Docket2010-0657

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 140 (State ex rel. Johnson v. Brunner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Johnson v. Brunner, 925 N.E.2d 140, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1549 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter and was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the writ of mandamus is denied based on laches.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. The late Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter and was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the writ of mandamus is denied based on laches.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. The late Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer did not participate in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 140, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-johnson-v-brunner-ohio-2010.