State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District
This text of State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District (State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 14328
IN THE SUPREME c m OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
STATE ex rel., RIcHAFCl K. JENNXS,
Relator,
THE DISTRICT COUET OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT e t al.,
Respondents.
Counsel o f Record:
For Relator:
Jack Scanlon argued, Anaconda, Montana
For Respondents:
Knight, Dahocd, mckay a d IWLean, Anaconda, Montana Conde Mackay argued, Anaconda, Wntana
Suhnitted: July 21, 1978
j. Filed: && - -Y w Mr. J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.
Relator, ~ i c h a r dK. J e n n i n g s , h a s a p p l i e d t o t h i s C o u r t
f o r a w r i t of supervisory c o n t r o l t o be d i r e c t e d t o t h e D i s -
t r i c t C o u r t of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Deer Lodge
County, and t o Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd and Honorable Arnold Olsen. The a p p l i c a t i o n c o n c e r n s j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c h i l d
c u s t o d y p r o c e e d i n g s i n i t i a t e d i n Montana by r e l a t o r ' s former
w i f e , Sandra J e n n i n g s , a s a r e s p o n s e t o s i m i l a r p r o c e e d i n g s b r o u g h t by r e l a t o r i n Iowa.
R i c h a r d and Sandra J e n n i n g s were m a r r i e d i n Iowa on
J u l y 2 5 , 1976. I t w a s Sandra J e n n i n g s ' second m a r r i a g e . Some two months l a t e r , t h e y were s e p a r a t e d . The husband, as
p e t i t i o n e r , was g r a n t e d a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n of m a r r i a g e o n F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 1977, t h r e e d a y s a f t e r t h e b i r t h of t h e
c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . The d e c r e e awarded c u s t o d y of t h e c h i l d
t o t h e wife. A t that time, s h e a l s o had c u s t o d y o f h e r s o n
under a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n from h e r p r e v i o u s m a r r i a g e .
During t h e e n s u i n g months, a number o f problems a r o s e
w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e h u s b a n d ' s v i s i t a t i o n r i g h t s and t h e p a r t i e s r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t on two o c c a s i o n s f o r
f u r t h e r c l a r i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e r i g h t s . On October 3 , 1977,
t h e w i f e moved t o Anaconda, Nontana, t o e s c a p e what s h e h a s
termed t h e h u s b a n d ' s " a b u s e and h a r a s s m e n t " . After she moved, t h e husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t and r e c e i v e d
a n o r d e r t e r m i n a t i n g h i s c h i l d s u p p o r t payments and g r a n t i n g him c u s t o d y of t h e c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . A short t i m e later,
t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t from h i s home i n Nebraska and r e c e i v e d a s i m i l a r o r d e r w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e c h i l d of t h e w i f e ' s m a r r i a g e t o him. The w i f e d i d
n o t a t t e n d e i t h e r of t h e s e hearings. On ~ p r i 21, 1978, r e l a t o r f i l e d t h e Iowa o r d e r modi- l
f y i n g c u s t o d y w i t h t h e C l e r k of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t , Deer Lodge County, Montana, s o t h a t i t m i g h t b e e n f o r c e d i n t h i s s t a t e p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 61-416, R.C.M. 1947 (Supp. 1 9 7 7 ) .
On t h e h u s b a n d ' s m o t i o n , t h e Honorable Arnold O l s e n , s i t t i n g
i n t h e a b s e n c e of Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd, i s s u e d a n o r d e r g i v i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t t o t h e Iowa p r o c e e d i n g s and
d i r e c t i n g t h e w i f e t o s u r r e n d e r c u s t o d y of t h e d a u g h t e r t o
t h e husband. The w i f e w a s never s e r v e d w i t h t h i s o r d e r .
On May 3 , 1978, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r a h e a r i n g c h a l l e n g i n g t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e Iowa
d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o modify t h e d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n as t o
custody. T h a t s a m e d a y , Judge O l s e n a g a i n o r d e r e d t h e w i f e
t o r e l i n q u i s h c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r . However, Judge Boyd,
having r e t u r n e d t o t h e bench, i s s u e d a temporary r e s t r a i n i n g
o r d e r p r o h i b i t i n g t h e husband from t a k i n g c u s t o d y of t h e
daughter u n t i l a hearing could be held concerning t h e matter.
On May 9, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e c o u r t t o modify t h e Iowa
d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n and r e t u r n l e g a l c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r
t o her. T h a t same d a y , c o u n s e l f o r r e l a t o r f i l e d a motion s e e k i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t f o r t h e Iowa o r d e r o b t a i n e d by
t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e w i f e ' s son. The f i r s t husband l a t e r o b t a i n e d c u s t o d y of t h e s o n t h r o u g h
habeas c o r p u s p r o c e e d i n g s i n t h e S t a t e of Washington where t h e w i f e had t a k e n t h e s o n f o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t . On May 30, r e l a t o r moved t h a t t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r b e quashed, t h e p e t i t i o n f o r m o d i f i c a t i o n d i s m i s s e d ,
and t h e A p r i l 21 o r d e r e n f o r c e d . Judge Boyd d e n i e d t h e h u s b a n d ' s motion and o r d e r e d him t o s e e k a w r i t o f s u p e r -
v i s o r y c o n t r o l i n t h i s C o u r t t o d e t e r m i n e t h e q u e s t i o n of jurisdiction. W e hold t h a t supervisory c o n t r o l i s n o t a
n e c e s s a r y remedy under t h e s e f a c t s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l i e f
s o u g h t by r e l a t o r . T h i s C o u r t , i n S t a t e e x r e l . Woodahl v . D i s t r i c t C o u r t
( 1 9 7 5 ) , 166 Mont. 31, 38, 530 P.2d 780, 785, h e l d :
" * * * when t h e f a c t s c l e a r l y show t h a t a p a r t y h a s no p l a i n , speedy o r a d e q u a t e remedy a t law, and when t h e r e i s no r i g h t of a p p e a l from a d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s o r d e r , a w r i t of s u p e r v i s o r y c o n t r o l may i s s u e s o t h a t t h e d e c i s i o n of t h e lower c o u r t may b e reviewed by t h e Montana Supreme C o u r t " . F u r t h e r , t h i s C o u r t , i n P e t i t i o n of C h a r l e s Waite, Jr.
( 1 9 6 4 ) , 143 Mont. 321, 322, 389 P.2d 407, 408, s t a t e d :
" I t i s incumbent f u r t h e r upon p e t i t i o n e r s seeking o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h i s c o u r t t o make a showing of t h e inadequacy o r u n a v a i l - a b i l i t y of any o t h e r remedy, e i t h e r i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t o r by way of a p p e a l t o t h i s court " . R e l a t o r h a s a p l a i n and speedy remedy a t law a v a i l a b l e
t o him by a p p e a l from any a c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t .
T h e r e f o r e , t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e l a t o r i s d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t
p r e j u d i c e and t h i s matter i s remanded t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t
of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t f o r s u c h f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s
a s i t may deem a p p r o p r i a t e .
W e Concur:
%,-Jw WdWeq Chief J u s t i c e
.- - .,>v,%"- 6, +<&I?)
, / Justices L' L/
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jennings-v-district-mont-1978.