State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District

Montana Supreme Court·Decided August 21, 1978·No. 14328·Published

Opinion

No. 14328

IN THE SUPREME c m OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

STATE ex rel., RIcHAFCl K. JENNXS,

Relator,

THE DISTRICT COUET OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT e t al.,

Respondents.

Counsel o f Record:

For Relator:

Jack Scanlon argued, Anaconda, Montana

For Respondents:

Knight, Dahocd, mckay a d IWLean, Anaconda, Montana Conde Mackay argued, Anaconda, Wntana

Suhnitted: July 21, 1978

j. Filed: && - -Y w Mr. J u s t i c e John Conway H a r r i s o n d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.

Relator, ~ i c h a r dK. J e n n i n g s , h a s a p p l i e d t o t h i s C o u r t

f o r a w r i t of supervisory c o n t r o l t o be d i r e c t e d t o t h e D i s -

t r i c t C o u r t of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Deer Lodge

County, and t o Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd and Honorable Arnold Olsen. The a p p l i c a t i o n c o n c e r n s j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r c h i l d

c u s t o d y p r o c e e d i n g s i n i t i a t e d i n Montana by r e l a t o r ' s former

w i f e , Sandra J e n n i n g s , a s a r e s p o n s e t o s i m i l a r p r o c e e d i n g s b r o u g h t by r e l a t o r i n Iowa.

R i c h a r d and Sandra J e n n i n g s were m a r r i e d i n Iowa on

J u l y 2 5 , 1976. I t w a s Sandra J e n n i n g s ' second m a r r i a g e . Some two months l a t e r , t h e y were s e p a r a t e d . The husband, as

p e t i t i o n e r , was g r a n t e d a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n of m a r r i a g e o n F e b r u a r y 2 4 , 1977, t h r e e d a y s a f t e r t h e b i r t h of t h e

c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . The d e c r e e awarded c u s t o d y of t h e c h i l d

t o t h e wife. A t that time, s h e a l s o had c u s t o d y o f h e r s o n

under a d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n from h e r p r e v i o u s m a r r i a g e .

During t h e e n s u i n g months, a number o f problems a r o s e

w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e h u s b a n d ' s v i s i t a t i o n r i g h t s and t h e p a r t i e s r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t on two o c c a s i o n s f o r

f u r t h e r c l a r i f i c a t i o n of t h e s e r i g h t s . On October 3 , 1977,

t h e w i f e moved t o Anaconda, Nontana, t o e s c a p e what s h e h a s

termed t h e h u s b a n d ' s " a b u s e and h a r a s s m e n t " . After she moved, t h e husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t and r e c e i v e d

a n o r d e r t e r m i n a t i n g h i s c h i l d s u p p o r t payments and g r a n t i n g him c u s t o d y of t h e c o u p l e ' s d a u g h t e r . A short t i m e later,

t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband r e t u r n e d t o t h e Iowa c o u r t from h i s home i n Nebraska and r e c e i v e d a s i m i l a r o r d e r w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e c h i l d of t h e w i f e ' s m a r r i a g e t o him. The w i f e d i d

n o t a t t e n d e i t h e r of t h e s e hearings. On ~ p r i 21, 1978, r e l a t o r f i l e d t h e Iowa o r d e r modi- l

f y i n g c u s t o d y w i t h t h e C l e r k of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t , Deer Lodge County, Montana, s o t h a t i t m i g h t b e e n f o r c e d i n t h i s s t a t e p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 61-416, R.C.M. 1947 (Supp. 1 9 7 7 ) .

On t h e h u s b a n d ' s m o t i o n , t h e Honorable Arnold O l s e n , s i t t i n g

i n t h e a b s e n c e of Honorable R o b e r t J. Boyd, i s s u e d a n o r d e r g i v i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t t o t h e Iowa p r o c e e d i n g s and

d i r e c t i n g t h e w i f e t o s u r r e n d e r c u s t o d y of t h e d a u g h t e r t o

t h e husband. The w i f e w a s never s e r v e d w i t h t h i s o r d e r .

On May 3 , 1978, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r a h e a r i n g c h a l l e n g i n g t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e Iowa

d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o modify t h e d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n as t o

custody. T h a t s a m e d a y , Judge O l s e n a g a i n o r d e r e d t h e w i f e

t o r e l i n q u i s h c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r . However, Judge Boyd,

having r e t u r n e d t o t h e bench, i s s u e d a temporary r e s t r a i n i n g

o r d e r p r o h i b i t i n g t h e husband from t a k i n g c u s t o d y of t h e

daughter u n t i l a hearing could be held concerning t h e matter.

On May 9, t h e w i f e p e t i t i o n e d t h e c o u r t t o modify t h e Iowa

d e c r e e of d i s s o l u t i o n and r e t u r n l e g a l c u s t o d y of h e r d a u g h t e r

t o her. T h a t same d a y , c o u n s e l f o r r e l a t o r f i l e d a motion s e e k i n g f u l l f a i t h and c r e d i t f o r t h e Iowa o r d e r o b t a i n e d by

t h e w i f e ' s f i r s t husband w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e w i f e ' s son. The f i r s t husband l a t e r o b t a i n e d c u s t o d y of t h e s o n t h r o u g h

habeas c o r p u s p r o c e e d i n g s i n t h e S t a t e of Washington where t h e w i f e had t a k e n t h e s o n f o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t . On May 30, r e l a t o r moved t h a t t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r b e quashed, t h e p e t i t i o n f o r m o d i f i c a t i o n d i s m i s s e d ,

and t h e A p r i l 21 o r d e r e n f o r c e d . Judge Boyd d e n i e d t h e h u s b a n d ' s motion and o r d e r e d him t o s e e k a w r i t o f s u p e r -

v i s o r y c o n t r o l i n t h i s C o u r t t o d e t e r m i n e t h e q u e s t i o n of jurisdiction. W e hold t h a t supervisory c o n t r o l i s n o t a

n e c e s s a r y remedy under t h e s e f a c t s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e r e l i e f

s o u g h t by r e l a t o r . T h i s C o u r t , i n S t a t e e x r e l . Woodahl v . D i s t r i c t C o u r t

( 1 9 7 5 ) , 166 Mont. 31, 38, 530 P.2d 780, 785, h e l d :

" * * * when t h e f a c t s c l e a r l y show t h a t a p a r t y h a s no p l a i n , speedy o r a d e q u a t e remedy a t law, and when t h e r e i s no r i g h t of a p p e a l from a d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s o r d e r , a w r i t of s u p e r v i s o r y c o n t r o l may i s s u e s o t h a t t h e d e c i s i o n of t h e lower c o u r t may b e reviewed by t h e Montana Supreme C o u r t " . F u r t h e r , t h i s C o u r t , i n P e t i t i o n of C h a r l e s Waite, Jr.

( 1 9 6 4 ) , 143 Mont. 321, 322, 389 P.2d 407, 408, s t a t e d :

" I t i s incumbent f u r t h e r upon p e t i t i o n e r s seeking o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h i s c o u r t t o make a showing of t h e inadequacy o r u n a v a i l - a b i l i t y of any o t h e r remedy, e i t h e r i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t o r by way of a p p e a l t o t h i s court " . R e l a t o r h a s a p l a i n and speedy remedy a t law a v a i l a b l e

t o him by a p p e a l from any a c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t .

T h e r e f o r e , t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of r e l a t o r i s d i s m i s s e d w i t h o u t

p r e j u d i c e and t h i s matter i s remanded t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t

of t h e T h i r d J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t f o r s u c h f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s

a s i t may deem a p p r o p r i a t e .

W e Concur:

%,-Jw WdWeq Chief J u s t i c e

.- - .,>v,%"- 6, +<&I?)

, / Justices L' L/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District, (Mo. 1978).

State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District (State Ex Rel. Jennings v. District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related