State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland
619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436
Opinion
The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland, 619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436 (Ohio 1993).
619 N.E.2d 686 (State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jells v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2008