State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland
619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436
This text of 619 N.E.2d 686 (State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland, 619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436 (Ohio 1993).
Opinion
The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jells v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2008
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jells-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1993.