State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland

619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 1993·No. No. 93-206·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland, 619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436 (Ohio 1993).

619 N.E.2d 686 (State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jells v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2008