State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland

619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 6, 1993
DocketNo. 93-206
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 619 N.E.2d 686 (State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Jells v. City of Cleveland, 619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436 (Ohio 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jells v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2008

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 N.E.2d 686, 67 Ohio St. 3d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jells-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1993.