State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999)
This text of State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999) (State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus, the relator must establish that: 1) the relator possesses a clear legal right to the relief requested; 2) the respondent possesses a clear legal duty to perform the requested act; and 3) the relator possesses no plain and adequate remedy at law. State exrel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994),
Accordingly, we grant the respondent's motion to dismiss. Costs to relator.
Writ dismissed.
ANN DYKE, J. CONCURS.
JAMES M. PORTER, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jefferson-v-mcmonagle-unpublished-decision-3-18-1999-ohioctapp-1999.