State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 1999·No. No. 75891·Unpublished

Opinion

OPINION
Relator, Sell Jefferson, has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus that requires the respondent, Judge Timothy E. McMonagle, to "hold a hearing to determine what relator's parole eligibility would be." The respondent has filed a motion to dismiss.

In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus, the relator must establish that: 1) the relator possesses a clear legal right to the relief requested; 2) the respondent possesses a clear legal duty to perform the requested act; and 3) the relator possesses no plain and adequate remedy at law. State exrel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 65. Herein, the relator has failed to establish that he possesses a clear right to a hearing. In addition, the realtor has failed to established that the respondent possesses a clear duty to conduct a hearing with regard to parole eligibility. State ex rel. WestchesterEstates, Inc. v. Bacon (1980), 37 Ohio St.2d 42.

Accordingly, we grant the respondent's motion to dismiss. Costs to relator.

Writ dismissed.

ANN DYKE, J. CONCURS.

JAMES M. PORTER, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999), (Ohio Ct. App. 1999).

State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999) (State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. McMonagle, Unpublished Decision (3-18-1999)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Trustees v. Budget Commission
306 N.E.2d 422 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1974)
State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson
637 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)