State ex rel. Jarrow v. State
This text of 222 So. 3d 1256 (State ex rel. Jarrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
h Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Finally, the application is repetitive. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Jarrow v. State, 15-02238 (La. 8/4/17), — So.3d -.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 So. 3d 1256, 2017 WL 3379034, 2017 La. LEXIS 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jarrow-v-state-la-2017.