State ex rel. Jarrow v. State

222 So. 3d 1256, 2017 WL 3379034, 2017 La. LEXIS 1586
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 4, 2017·No. No. 2016-KH-0480·Published

Opinion

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM:

h Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Finally, the application is repetitive. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Jarrow v. State, 15-02238 (La. 8/4/17), — So.3d -.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Jarrow v. State, 222 So. 3d 1256, 2017 WL 3379034, 2017 La. LEXIS 1586 (La. 2017).

222 So. 3d 1256 (State ex rel. Jarrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State
665 So. 2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State Ex Rel. Glover v. State
660 So. 2d 1189 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)
State v. Cotton
45 So. 3d 1030 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)