Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State Ex Rel. James v. Hanefeld

State Ex Rel. James v. Hanefeld

191 N.E. 6, 128 Ohio St. 259, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 259, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 315
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 18, 1934
Docket24512
StatusPublished

This text of 191 N.E. 6 (State Ex Rel. James v. Hanefeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. James v. Hanefeld, 191 N.E. 6, 128 Ohio St. 259, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 259, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 315 (Ohio 1934).

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer of the respondents to the petition of the relator, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that the demurrer to the petition be, and the same hereby is, sustained on authority of Sergeant v. McSweeney, Dir. of Public Welfare, 126 Ohio St., 623.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Matthias, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur. Jones and Beyis, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sergeant v. McSweeney
187 N.E. 241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.E. 6, 128 Ohio St. 259, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 259, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-james-v-hanefeld-ohio-1934.