State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 44, 83 Ohio St. 3d 398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 Ohio St. 3d 266
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 21, 1998·No. 1997-2535·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 398.]

THE STATE EX REL. JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-44.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-2535—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 21, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD12-1746. __________________ Debra J. Randman, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cordelia A. Glenn, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. F.E. SWEENEY, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 44, 83 Ohio St. 3d 398 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 44 (State ex rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.