State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper
113 P. 1058, 84 Kan. 446, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed for these reasons: The question whether the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial can not be determined because the record does not show any request for one. The case having been heard by the court, any admission of incompetent evidence was not reversible error, if there was competent evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, and we find that to be the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper, 113 P. 1058, 84 Kan. 446, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349 (kan 1911).
113 P. 1058 (State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Overson v. Martin
367 P.2d 203 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1961)
In Re Estate of Johnson
270 P.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1954)