State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper

Supreme Court of Kansas

State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper

113 P. 1058, 84 Kan. 446, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMarch 11, 1911

DocketNo. 16,970

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 P. 1058 (State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Jackson v. Harper, 113 P. 1058, 84 Kan. 446, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349 (kan 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case must be affirmed for these reasons: The question whether the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial can not be determined because the record does not show any request for one. The case having been heard by the court, any admission of incompetent evidence was not reversible error, if there was competent evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, and we find that to be the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case must be affirmed for these reasons: The question whether the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial can not be determined because the record does not show any request for one. The case having been heard by the court, any admission of incompetent evidence was not reversible error, if there was competent evidence sufficient to sustain the judgment, and we find that to be the case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 P. 1058, 84 Kan. 446, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-jackson-v-harper-kan-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack