State ex rel. Isreal v. Rosmarin

679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1618
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1997
Docket97-582
StatusPublished

This text of 679 N.E.2d 307 (State ex rel. Isreal v. Rosmarin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Isreal v. Rosmarin, 679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1618 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for judicial notice and on motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-isreal-v-rosmarin-ohio-1997.