State ex rel. Interstate Motor Freight System v. O'Neill

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Interstate Motor Freight System v. O'Neill

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 139

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1957·No. No. 35213·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators contend there is a mandatory duty, ministerial in character, imposed upon the respondents by Sec[141]*141tion 5728.15, Revised Code, to enter into a reciprocity agreement. This contention was rejected by this court in the case of Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 166 Ohio St., 427, 432, 143 N. E. (2d), 835. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ- is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taft, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relators contend there is a mandatory duty, ministerial in character, imposed upon the respondents by Sec[141]*141tion 5728.15, Revised Code, to enter into a reciprocity agreement. This contention was rejected by this court in the case of Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 166 Ohio St., 427, 432, 143 N. E. (2d), 835. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ- is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taft, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Interstate Motor Freight System v. O'Neill, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 139 (Ohio 1957).

Pincite

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 139 (State ex rel. Interstate Motor Freight System v. O'Neill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.