State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections

715 N.E.2d 576, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3090
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 1999
Docket99-1461
StatusPublished

This text of 715 N.E.2d 576 (State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Inskeep v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Elections, 715 N.E.2d 576, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3090 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of mandamus be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., would dismiss the cause. Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny for laches and because the cause is improper for injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
715 N.E.2d 576, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-inskeep-v-warren-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1999.