State ex rel. Inge v. Nuzum

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Inge v. Nuzum

93 Ohio St. 3d 1306

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 7, 2001

Docket01-1621

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1306 (State ex rel. Inge v. Nuzum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Inge v. Nuzum, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1306 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent Rolf Baumgartel, answer of respondent William L. Burton, answer of respondent Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio, motion to dismiss of Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio, and/or motion for judgment on pleadings of Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent Rolf Baumgartel, answer of respondent William L. Burton, answer of respondent Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio, motion to dismiss of Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio, and/or motion for judgment on pleadings of Judge W.M. Nuzum III, Municipal Court of Marietta, Ohio. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-inge-v-nuzum-ohio-2001.