State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm.

795 N.E.2d 685, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1547
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2003
Docket2002-1627
StatusPublished

This text of 795 N.E.2d 685 (State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm., 795 N.E.2d 685, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1547 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 01AP-982, 2002-0hio-4014. Reported at 99 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-3627, 791 [1548]*1548N.E.2d 443. On motion for reconsideration of Transdigm, Inc. and Aero Products. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Ignatious v. Industrial Commission
99 Ohio St. 3d 285 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 N.E.2d 685, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ignatious-v-indus-comm-ohio-2003.