State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm.

795 N.E.2d 685, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1547
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. 2002-1627·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 01AP-982, 2002-0hio-4014. Reported at 99 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-3627, 791 [1548] N.E.2d 443. On motion for reconsideration of Transdigm, Inc. and Aero Products. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm., 795 N.E.2d 685, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1547 (Ohio 2003).

795 N.E.2d 685 (State ex rel. Ignatious v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Ignatious v. Industrial Commission
99 Ohio St. 3d 285 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)