State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea

602 So. 2d 11, 1992 La. LEXIS 2475, 1992 WL 198159

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 La. LEXIS 3658 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 12, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-2238·Published

Opinion

In re Hyorth, Daniel F.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 276-390.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about May 22, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hyorth, Daniel F.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 276-390.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about May 22, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea, 602 So. 2d 11, 1992 La. LEXIS 2475, 1992 WL 198159 (La. 1992).

Pincite

602 So. 2d 11 (State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.