State ex rel. Husk v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Florida

State ex rel. Husk v. Buchanan

174 So. 2d 742, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3150

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 3, 1965·No. No. 33770·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order herein of February 17, 1965 denying certiorari is hereby vacated, set aside and held for naught.

Upon further inspection of the record and further consideration by the Court, the [743]*743petition for certiorari herein directed to the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District of Florida, dated August 25, 1964, 167 So.2d 38, be and the same is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents — would grant on jurisdiction and merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order herein of February 17, 1965 denying certiorari is hereby vacated, set aside and held for naught.

Upon further inspection of the record and further consideration by the Court, the [743]*743petition for certiorari herein directed to the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District of Florida, dated August 25, 1964, 167 So.2d 38, be and the same is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents — would grant on jurisdiction and merits.

State ex rel. Husk v. Buchanan, 174 So. 2d 742, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3150 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

174 So. 2d 742 (State ex rel. Husk v. Buchanan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related