State ex rel. Hurst v. Criminal District Court, Section "G"

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hurst v. Criminal District Court, Section "G"

620 So. 2d 825, 1993 La. LEXIS 2074, 1993 WL 228380

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 25, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KH-1456

StatusPublished

This text of 620 So. 2d 825 (State ex rel. Hurst v. Criminal District Court, Section "G") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hurst v. Criminal District Court, Section "G", 620 So. 2d 825, 1993 La. LEXIS 2074, 1993 WL 228380 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hurst, Thomas Wayne; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, Nos. 206,746, 206,-751.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to vacate an illegal sentence he has filed on or about April 25, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hurst, Thomas Wayne; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, Nos. 206,746, 206,-751.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to vacate an illegal sentence he has filed on or about April 25, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 825, 1993 La. LEXIS 2074, 1993 WL 228380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hurst-v-criminal-district-court-section-g-la-1993.