State ex rel. Hunter v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court

95 N.E.2d 634, 229 Ind. 79, 1950 Ind. LEXIS 103
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1950
DocketNo. O-153
StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.E.2d 634 (State ex rel. Hunter v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hunter v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court, 95 N.E.2d 634, 229 Ind. 79, 1950 Ind. LEXIS 103 (Ind. 1950).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

verified petition here seeks to mandate the trial court to determine relator’s petition to modify a judgment of conviction. The petition here fails to show any service of notice on the Attorney General of Indiana as required by §49-1937, Burns’ 1933 (1949 Supp.), and it fails to set out “certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter” in the trial court. For these reasons the issuance of the alternative writ is denied on the authority of State ex rel. Bramlett v. LaPorte Superior Court (1950), 229 Ind. 77, 95 N. E. 2d 631, decided today, and cases therein cited.

Note.—Reported in 95 N. E. 2d 634.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Bramlett v. LaPorte Superior Court
95 N.E.2d 631 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.E.2d 634, 229 Ind. 79, 1950 Ind. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hunter-v-vanderburgh-circuit-court-ind-1950.