State ex rel. Hunter v. Certain Judges of Akron Municipal Court
641 N.E.2d 722, 71 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2592
Opinions
The action in mandamus and prohibition is dismissed because relator has an adequate remedy at law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Hunter v. Certain Judges of Akron Municipal Court, 641 N.E.2d 722, 71 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2592 (Ohio 1994).
641 N.E.2d 722 (State ex rel. Hunter v. Certain Judges of Akron Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Smith v. Culliver
929 N.E.2d 465 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)
Yates v. Eberlin, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2005)
2005 Ohio 4763 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Daniel v. State, Unpublished Decision (9-12-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Wittenberg, Unpublished Decision (3-20-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers
1998 Ohio 276 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward
689 N.E.2d 971 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
State ex rel Dannaher v. Crawford
1997 Ohio 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
In re Estate of Davis
1996 Ohio 347 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
State ex rel. Lyons v. Zaleski
1996 Ohio 267 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
State ex rel. Hunter v. Patterson
1996 Ohio 203 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
State ex rel. Newton v. Court of Claims
1995 Ohio 117 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)