Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Hunt Sports Ent. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Hunt Sports Ent. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas

693 N.E.2d 284, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1528, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1223
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 27, 1998
Docket98-762
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 693 N.E.2d 284 (State ex rel. Hunt Sports Ent. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hunt Sports Ent. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 693 N.E.2d 284, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1528, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1223 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for issuance of alternative writ and emergency motion for stay, and the motion for leave to intervene by John H. McConnell and Wolfe Enterprises, Inc.,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises
725 N.E.2d 1193 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 N.E.2d 284, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1528, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hunt-sports-ent-v-franklin-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1998.