State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Humphrey
This text of 79 N.C. 396 (State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suppose the guardian were alive, would it avail the defendant his surety, to show that the guardian was solvent and able to pay his .ward, the plaintiff? Of course not. The guardian being dead, would it avail the defendant surety to prove that his estate is solvent and able to pay ? Of course not, any more than if he were alive and. able to pay. How then can it avail the defendant to prove that the guardian is dead and his estate insolvent and unable to pay ? The defendant puts his defence upon the ground that the estate of the guardian which went into the hands of his administrator was sufficient to pay. the ward, and that the administrator has wasted it, and that he and the sureties on his administration bond are insolvent.
This makes it unfortunate for the defendant, but then his undertaking when he signed the guardian bond as surety, was, that he would suffer before the ward should. And he is now only performing that undertaking. If he had performed it earlier, he might have saved himself out of the estate of the guardian in the hands of the administrator.
No error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.C. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-humphrey-v-humphrey-nc-1878.