State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm.

2001 Ohio 1322, 93 Ohio St. 3d 252

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 26, 2001

Docket2001-0449

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1322 (State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 1322, 93 Ohio St. 3d 252 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 252.]

THE STATE EX REL. HULING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1322.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-449—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 26, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-416. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Seaman & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Angelique M. Hartzell, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 252.]

THE STATE EX REL. HULING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Huling v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1322.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-449—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 26, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-416. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Seaman & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Angelique M. Hartzell, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1322, 93 Ohio St. 3d 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-huling-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack