State ex rel. Hughley v. Berens

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Hughley v. Berens

915 N.E.2d 662, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1439

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 2009·No. 2009-1256·Published

Opinion

Fairfield App. No. 2009-CA-24, 2009-Ohio-3277. On September 16, 2009, this court found Kevin Hughley to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Hughley was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On October 26, 2009, Hughley submitted a motion for leave to file motion for extension of time to file a merit brief. Upon review of the proffered motion for leave,

It is ordered by the court that Kevin Hughley’s motion for leave is denied.

Upon review of the documents filed in this case, the court finds the case to be without merit. Accordingly, it is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairfield App. No. 2009-CA-24, 2009-Ohio-3277. On September 16, 2009, this court found Kevin Hughley to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Hughley was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On October 26, 2009, Hughley submitted a motion for leave to file motion for extension of time to file a merit brief. Upon review of the proffered motion for leave,

It is ordered by the court that Kevin Hughley’s motion for leave is denied.

Upon review of the documents filed in this case, the court finds the case to be without merit. Accordingly, it is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case is dismissed.

State ex rel. Hughley v. Berens, 915 N.E.2d 662, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

915 N.E.2d 662 (State ex rel. Hughley v. Berens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.