State ex rel. Hughes v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Hughes v. Whitley

591 So. 2d 702, 1992 La. LEXIS 407, 1992 WL 11258

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1992

DocketNo. 92-KH-0068

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 702 (State ex rel. Hughes v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hughes v. Whitley, 591 So. 2d 702, 1992 La. LEXIS 407, 1992 WL 11258 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hughes, Marshall; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 246-696.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about August 29, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hughes, Marshall; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 246-696.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about August 29, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 702, 1992 La. LEXIS 407, 1992 WL 11258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hughes-v-whitley-la-1992.