State Ex Rel. Hughes v. McNabb

28 P.2d 521, 38 N.M. 92
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1933·No. No. 3855.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ZINN, Justice.

Appellees were granted a writ of mandamus against appellant as acting state comptroller, commanding him to give appellees access to certain records in his office that they may be informed of the amounts of gasoline taxes paid by each individual, corporation, firm, or association in the state engaged in the-gasoline business.

The question for decision herein is whether, pursuant to 1929 Comp. St. § 60-212, the records, books, papers, and returns of taxpayers of the gasoline excise tax, in the hands of the acting state comptroller, are public records-subject to inspection 'by any interested person.

In view of the fact that no substantial rights are involved, and the appellant is no longer the incumbent in office, and that 1920-Comp. St. § 60-212 was expressly repealed by Laws 19-33, c. 176, § 26, the question is moot, and it is contrary to our policy to- decide a moot cause. Board of County Commissioners v. Coors, 30 N. M. 482, 239 P. 524; State ex rel. Mirabal v. Greer, 37 N. M. 292, 21 P.(2d) 819.

The appeal will be dismissed, and the cause remanded.

It is so ordered.

WATSON, C. J., and SADLER, HUDS-PETH, and BICKLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Hughes v. McNabb, 28 P.2d 521, 38 N.M. 92 (N.M. 1933).

28 P.2d 521 (State Ex Rel. Hughes v. McNabb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gunaji v. MacIas
2001 NMSC 028 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 2001)
Appelman v. Beach
608 P.2d 1119 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1980)
Rossiter v. Benoit
88 Cal. App. 3d 706 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
New Mexico Bus Sales v. Michael
360 P.2d 639 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1961)
Hatch v. Keehan
293 P.2d 314 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1956)