State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Brandon

Supreme Court of Alabama

State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Brandon

95 So. 41, 208 Ala. 647, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 626

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 11, 1923

Docket6 Div. 710.

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 41 (State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Brandon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Brandon, 95 So. 41, 208 Ala. 647, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 626 (Ala. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The sheriff of Tuscaloosa county seeks by this mandamus proceeding to compel the payment by the hoard of revenue of said county of certain insolvent fees out of the general funds of the county. From the judgment of the court upon a final hearing, denying the petition, this appeal is prosecuted.

The learned judge of the court below has written an opinion giving the reasons for the conclusion reached, and which opinion also clearly states the question presented and the insistence of the respective parties to the cause. We have carefully examined the two local acts here involved in the light(iof argument of counsel, and have concluded that the trial court has 'properly construed these local acts and correctly ruled in dismissing the petition. We find ourselves in full accord with the opinion of the court below, and we therefore here adopt it as our own. Let the opinion be set out in the report of the ease.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARDNER, J.

The sheriff of Tuscaloosa county seeks by this mandamus proceeding to compel the payment by the hoard of revenue of said county of certain insolvent fees out of the general funds of the county. From the judgment of the court upon a final hearing, denying the petition, this appeal is prosecuted.

The learned judge of the court below has written an opinion giving the reasons for the conclusion reached, and which opinion also clearly states the question presented and the insistence of the respective parties to the cause. We have carefully examined the two local acts here involved in the light(iof argument of counsel, and have concluded that the trial court has 'properly construed these local acts and correctly ruled in dismissing the petition. We find ourselves in full accord with the opinion of the court below, and we therefore here adopt it as our own. Let the opinion be set out in the report of the ease.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 41, 208 Ala. 647, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hughes-v-brandon-ala-1923.