State ex rel. Hudson v. State

208 So. 3d 882, 2017 La. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 9, 2017
DocketNo. 2016-KH-1731
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 208 So. 3d 882 (State ex rel. Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Hudson v. State, 208 So. 3d 882, 2017 La. LEXIS 10 (La. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

| granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the Second Circuit Court of Appeal for its consideration.

Though this Court originally retained exclusive appellate jurisdiction over this pre-1982 felony conviction, see La. Const, art. V, § 5(E), following the substantive change of law announced in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the retroactive applicability of which was clarified in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), the matter was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in State v. Montgomery, 13-1163 (La. 6/28/16), 194 So.3d 606, and for resen-tencing pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 878.1. Accordingly, given that the United States Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence concerning the punishment of juvenile defendants undermined defendant’s original sentence, and that he was resentenced in 2016, when appellate jurisdiction in non-capital penalty cases triable by jury, such as this case, is vested in the intermediate courts of appeal, see La. Const, art. V, § 10(A) (eff. July 1, 1982, “[A] court of appeal has appellate jurisdiction of ... all criminal cases triable | ?by a jury,” except when a law has been declared unconstitutional or when the death penalty has been imposed), defendant’s pleading, which we construe as an appeal from his resentencing, see State v. Franks, 391 So.2d 1133 (La. 1980) (subsequent filings following resentencing treated as appeals by this Court), is subject to direct review in the court of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Schane
239 So. 3d 286 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2018)
State ex rel. Manieri v. State
222 So. 3d 717 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2017)
State ex rel. Gaskin v. State
211 So. 3d 381 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 3d 882, 2017 La. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hudson-v-state-la-2017.