State ex rel. Howlett v. Directors of the Ohio Penitentiary
5 Ohio St. 234
This text of 5 Ohio St. 234 (State ex rel. Howlett v. Directors of the Ohio Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Howlett v. Directors of the Ohio Penitentiary, 5 Ohio St. 234 (Ohio 1855).
Opinion
J. R. Swan, J.
The notice of the directors for proposals, invited bids which would be considered for the manufacture of articles other than wood type, etc. Hewlett’s bid came under that part of the notice in which the directors expressly reserved the right to accept or reject the bids. The bid did not therefore bind them. A peremptory mandamus is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States Wood Preserving Co. v. Sundmaker
186 F. 678 (Sixth Circuit, 1911)
State ex rel. Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Betts
4 Ohio C.C. 86 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1889)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio St. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howlett-v-directors-of-the-ohio-penitentiary-ohio-1855.