State ex rel. Howell v. Boles

140 S.E.2d 465, 149 W. Va. 263, 1965 W. Va. LEXIS 250
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1965
DocketNo. 12401
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 S.E.2d 465 (State ex rel. Howell v. Boles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Howell v. Boles, 140 S.E.2d 465, 149 W. Va. 263, 1965 W. Va. LEXIS 250 (W. Va. 1965).

Opinion

Berry, Judge:

The petitioner, Donald Howell, was indicted at the 1957 January Term of Court in Mingo County for the crime of breaking and entering. The trial court appointed an attorney to represent petitioner after which he pleaded guilty to the crime charged in the indictment, the sentence for such crime being one to ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

After pleading guilty and before sentencing, an information was filed alleging a prior felony conviction to which the petitioner admitted being the same person involved in the prior conviction. Thereupon, without duly cautioning the petitioner, as required by Code, 61-11-18 and 19, as amended, the court proceeded to sentence him to one to fifteen years confinement in the penitentiary.

The petitioner in this proceeding seeks relief from the additional five years sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit [264]*264Court of Mingo County under the recidivist statute of this state. The added portion of the sentence, in excess of the maximum statutory sentence for the principal offense, is void for the reason that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose such additional sentence. State ex rel. Franklin H. Beckett v. Otto C. Boles, Warden, etc., 149 W. Va. 112, 138 S. E. 2d 851.

The additional sentence of five years, imposed upon the petitioner, being void, cannot be enforced and relief from that portion of the sentence is granted under the writ heretofore awarded in this proceeding, and after the valid portion of his sentence has been served he should be released from confinement in the penitentiary. The valid portion of his sentence of one to ten years still being in effect the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the defendant until such valid sentence is satisfied.

Prisoner remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. McClure v. Boles
142 S.E.2d 773 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E.2d 465, 149 W. Va. 263, 1965 W. Va. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-howell-v-boles-wva-1965.